Skip to content

Replace Get operations with polling #2144

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2025

Conversation

prachirp
Copy link
Contributor

@prachirp prachirp commented Aug 6, 2025

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment only one /kind <> line, hit enter to put that in a new line, and remove leading whitespaces from that line:

/kind api-change
/kind bug

/kind cleanup

/kind design
/kind documentation
/kind failing-test
/kind feature
/kind flake

What this PR does / why we need it: Replace Get operations with polling in gce-compute.go

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: NONE

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. labels Aug 6, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @prachirp!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Aug 6, 2025

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: prachirp / name: Prachi Pendse (6b7e63f)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Aug 6, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @prachirp. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Aug 6, 2025
@sunnylovestiramisu
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Aug 6, 2025
@prachirp
Copy link
Contributor Author

prachirp commented Aug 6, 2025

/retest

@prachirp prachirp marked this pull request as ready for review August 6, 2025 18:26
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 6, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 6, 2025
@tonyzhc
Copy link
Contributor

tonyzhc commented Aug 6, 2025

/retest-required

@prachirp
Copy link
Contributor Author

prachirp commented Aug 7, 2025

/test pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-e2e-arm

@tonyzhc
Copy link
Contributor

tonyzhc commented Aug 7, 2025

/retest-required

@sunnylovestiramisu
Copy link
Contributor

/test pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-e2e-arm

@tonyzhc
Copy link
Contributor

tonyzhc commented Aug 8, 2025

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 9, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Aug 9, 2025

@prachirp: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-e2e-arm 6b7e63f link false /test pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-e2e-arm
pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-e2e-windows-2022 6b7e63f link false /test pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-e2e-windows-2022

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@sunnylovestiramisu
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 11, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: prachirp, sunnylovestiramisu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 11, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit b40d677 into kubernetes-sigs:master Aug 11, 2025
8 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants